Why Governments Regulate The Health Care Industry Economics Essay

Why brasss Regulate The Health make do Industry Economics EssayIn the starting part of the turn up we define merchandise hardship and look at the feign of unadulterated foodstuff, we then comp ar this with wellness c atomic number 18 mart and find out(p) the causes or factors that results in bereavement in the wellness deal out food securities industry. In the second part we go forth look at the ways governments in four unlike countries have intervened to ensure that the causes of the market unsuccessful person be corrected.Market failure tail assembly defined as a business office whereby at that place is a failure to achieve an efficient storage on the wholeocation of resources within the market economy.A fundamental line with the concept of market failure, as economists occasionally recognize, is that it describes a incident that exists everywhere (Nelson, 1987 Dahlman, 1979).There argon different kinds of market that exist in the corporation with the pure(a) market and monopoly at the extremes and the otherwises in between this spectrum.Perfect MarketThe hone market model to a fault referred to as a perfect rivalry is the well-nigh key model because it serves a benchmark from which other kinds of market tail be viewed. The briny objective of any unfluctuating in the market is to tap profit and the price of the goods and function are determined by market forces. The perfect market is based on the following assumptionsThere is h geniusst in mixed bagation,The transactions are im mortalal,There are no barriers to entry or exit,There are legion(predicate) buyer and sellers, and they mickle non influence the market price,The products are homogenous which means that the buyers cannot differentiate between products.Finally the goods are hugger-mugger goods.Why is health safekeeping market different?The first apprehension for this is that health care is a normal good which is different from a head-to-head good as see n in the perfect market model, unrestricted good has two features, non-rivalrous which means that the use of it by one person does not stop another from benefitting from it, and it is non-excludable this means it result grueling to stop people from enjoying the benefits. With public good on that point is what is effn as a free-rider business people ordain not pay for them because others are willing to pay for them. The nature of public goods poses a problem for the market because the head-to-head sphere will not make a profit from their homework since everyone can enjoy it whether they pay or not. Health care is in like manner a public good and under provision of it too leads to market failure. Health care is similarly a deservingness good that society values and believes that people should have them because exercise is believed to generate authoritative externalities-this will be discussed in the next paragraph as sanitary as other causes of market failure.Causes of market failure in health care1. ExternalitiesExternalities also referred to as third-party effects total when others are affected by the transaction arising from the production and consumption of health care for which the costs or benefits are not interpreted into measure.The core of the argument against market failure analysis is derived from the study of transactions. (Zerbe et al p7).Whenever there is a transaction externalities are known to occur which leads to transaction costs. This is defined as the resources requirement to transfer, earn and maintain attri barelye rights. The property rights was developed by R H Coase where he stated that individuals grad firms to reduce transaction costs. Externalities whitethorn ascend in different ways and they may be either positive (beneficial) or disconfirming (harmful), and can be during production or consumption. Examples of negative externality is smoking which results in external costs on a third party passive smokin g and also alcohol expenditure can lead to antisocial behaviour. Vaccination against infectious diseases is a form of positive externality where an individual is certain of protection by the consumption of another person. An example of external cost of production is via pollution from an manufacturing and external benefits of production is the patent rights given to firm that dis top of the inninged a new drug, stopping all other firms from copying the products. When there are externalities in health care this will not lead to a perfect market hence market failure will occur. The externalities discussed so far can be referred to as selfishly motivated. There is externality referred to as caring externality which occurs when individuals get personal satisfaction from sharp that a person is getting the health care they need. Externalities are close to us every day just they are not taken into account whenever there is a transaction, this is because property rights are not well d efined. Health care is not owned by anyone so hence there is economic incentive to protect it and the only way the property rights can be well defined and protected will be by dint of government regulation e.g. by banning smoking in public places and also qualification vaccinations compulsory. Even with government legislation it is difficult to achieve this. (Zerbe,1976,1980Medema and Zerbe,1999a),in a world in which property rights are in encompassing specified and in which transaction costs are zero, the allocation of resources will be efficient. This kind of world does not exist, this is an indication that market failure will always occur.2. imperfect tuitionEconomics is concerned with the efficient use of limited productive resources for the purpose of attaining the maximum satisfaction of our hearty wants (Jackson and McConnell, 1985, p3), this involves transacting parties utilising these resources to meet and satisfy their wants. This is based on the assumption that t he parties have estimable information about the goods and services being bought or sold and also about each other. These assumptions describe a market where there is perfect information (Stiglitz, 1993).In the health care there is imperfect information and/or information unbalance. Information asymmetry can be defined (using the acquirement of health amends as a classical example) as office staff whereby client that wants to get a health damages has more particular information about himself than the indemnity company. Imperfect information is the case of a physician who has more knowledge than patients. The uncertainty of illness and the cost of it when it arises is one the principal reasons for taking health redress. Two problems arise whenever there is insurance cover these are adverse selection and lesson hazard. Information asymmetry and adverse selection was first described by George Akerlof in his article, The market for lemons Quality, Uncertainty and the Market Mecha nism. Adverse selection is often referred to as a hidden information problem in a market, where for example sellers may know more about a product than a customer. (Estrin and Laidler). During the 1980s, when human immunodeficiency virus/AIDS was first discover insurance companies suffered from adverse selection as a lot on individuals with this disease took increased insurance cover without disclosing their status. This led to the suggestion that genetic testing should be utilise for individuals who may wish to acquire health insurance.The concept moral hazard was first defined by the French economist Dreze in 1961 (Mooney 1994, p 135), scarce it is often described as a hidden action because it results in behavioural changes in patients once their expected losses are covered by health insurance. Ehrlich and Becker (1972) distinguished between ex ante and ex post moral hazard. The former occur in a salubrious state when individuals can engage in preventive care such(prenominal)( prenominal) as regular exercises and good eating habits and the latter when the individual is ill, but since the health be it taxation or other forms of health insurance which allows a subsidise price or free at the picture of use, there is a greater necessity by the patient than it will be if the patient was to pay all the costs. Donaldson and Gerard (1993, p 31), comments,thus, the market fails to give efficient price signals to consumers.Donaldson and Gerrard (1993) identified two types of provider moral hazard. They point moral hazard by doctors who are identifiable actors in the health care system and also moral hazard by hospitals. Doctors are known to act on behalf of the patients both as the shooter and supplier of services and do not account for the cost. First on the supply place they are the provider of health care and on the demand align there is information asymmetry. There are different reimbursement which affects doctors attitudes and two that affects the patie nts attitudes ( charges to patients, private practice).Provider moral hazard occurs most commonly with the fee-for-service (FFS) reimbursement doctors are paid on the quantity of services more services will result in a higher income. Therefore there is a financial incentive for physicians to provide care in excess of what the patients may require if they had full moon information. There is not much literature on hospital moral hazard so this can be an area for future development.3. Imperfect competitionThe perfect market provide the best means of making sure that the economy is efficient by encouraging firms to make do and also creating choice. These conditions for efficiency serve as a benchmark to help direct sources of allocative inefficiency referred to as market failures. But in the real world the perfect market does not exist as Hausman argued, when taken literally, the notion of market failure is of little relevance, because perfectly competitive equilibrium, the benchmar k against which market fail, does not obtain. Despite this the competitive market have been used on the assumptions on which it was formed, as Amelia Fletcher, Director of Markets and Policies Initiatives commented, Competition is a rivalrous process, in which firms compete effectively to give the consumers a better deal. The question is that is this obtainable in health care with the uncertainty that surrounds ill health? The first problem here is the limited information has about the outcomes and benefits of various medical treatments. Individuals seldom have the same illness over time so there is little opportunity to acquire information and even on those with farsighted standing chronic illness like diabetes who may have information. The changing world of advanced technologies means that there will be information disparities. Oligopoly is the dominant market model in health care and McPake and Normand (2008, p 141) noted, the key feature of an oligopoly is that the decision ma de by one firm depends on the decision made by other firms, i.e. there is a high degree of interdependence between firms. Thus there may be incentives for hospitals to collude which results in adverse outcomes for the society. It is generally accepted that competition works best when there is excess capacity, but in health care there is excess demand.4. Inequality and povertyAn individual cogency to purchase health care depends upon his income to a large extent. In measuring rod economic theory its the ability and willingness to pay that determines how resources are maximally utilize but this does not happen in the real world as we have noted from previous sections in this essay. Goodwin (2005) commented that, hospitals make demand and other raw materials from suppliers with the expectation that the final products will be bought by consumers-the demand by consumers are those backed by the consumers ability to pay. So what is of the essence(p) in a perfect market is effective dem and i.e., there is distribution of resources to meet the basic human needs. Therefore if for example a few(prenominal) wealthy people desire a particular commodity and many poor people lack money to purchase basic health needs then the market will be stimulated to bring about those commodities for the rich, hence the market will fail.Government intervention and regulation of health care marketFrom our discussion it can be seen that intervention is necessary to counteract the causes of market failure as well as the consequences much(prenominal) as adverse selection and moral hazard.Boadway and Wildasin (1984, p 61) suggest that, objet dart typically the remedy for market failure due to public goods is for the public sector to provide the good, the remedy for externalities is often to provide incentives to the private sector to produce the correct amount.We will examined detailed evidence from four countries the get together Kingdom (UK), the United relegates of America ( ground forces),France and Finland to ascertain how they intervene and regulate their health care systems.Methods of government intervention1. State provisionOne of the main ways of solving market failure is through public financial support of the health service. In the UK, France and Finland hospitals are funded through taxes but in UK it is through general taxation while France and Finland use a social insurance system. This system ensures universal coverage for the population, prevents exploitation of patients by monopoly of providers. The main problem is the issue moral hazard which is more common in publicly tax funded system in UK than the social insurance system of Finland and France. In the UK the issue of moral hazard is controlled by using gatekeepers, wait lists, waiting times. In France and Finland price mechanism is used to deter moral hazard. Compared to the ground forces where it is more of private insurance, co-payments, deductibles and medical savings account schemes ha ve been used as ways of reducing moral hazard. Donaldson and Gerard (1993, p 72) argued that, even the US health care system recognises the shortcomings of a total reliance upon market forces. The main form of government regulation there is in the form of insurance schemes for elderly people (Medicare) and indigent people (Medicaid). But in the USA, adverse selection is very common and it also occurs in UK but to a lesser extent, but this is almost non-existent in the social insurance system (France and Finland).2. Taxation and subsidiesImperfections in the market lead to inefficient allocation of resources and this leads to negative or positive externalities. Taxation is used to discourage certain behaviours like monopolising and overpricing and subsidies can help to reduce the cost of paying for merit goods like health care. Governments in all four countries for example in order to reduce the negative externalities caused by smoking introduced taxes for the purchase for cigarettes and also legislate that companies should advertise the dangers of smoking on the pack of cigarettes sold.Antirust legislation are passed in all four countries e.g. law prohibiting the formation of monopolies and preventing imperfect competition.3. legislationDolan and Olsen (2002), commented that there is constant pressure for more spending in most health services around the world, therefore policy makers have to oblige regulative measures on the providers of services to achieve efficient allocation of the resources. legislation can be through price control, quality control e.t.c. formula of pharmaceuticals is one area where most of government intervention occur, for example in the UK, the National Institute of Clinical Excellence(NICE) issues guidelines on which drugs are approved and can also be used. Also sets a ceiling on how much the cost should be but one main disadvantage is that it can exclude the use of new and effective treatment because of the costs. In USA there is the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) which also a regulatory body. In France there is the Agence Francaise de Securite Sanitaire des Produits de Sante (AFSSAPS), and in Finland the National Agency for Medicines.4. address benefit analysisGovernment intervention must take into account the cost benefit analysis, if the benefits are more than the costs. Then the government should gull taxes and provide the good.Government failureGovernment failure can occur when mechanisms put in place to improve the market failure worsens the situation and lead to inefficiency and inequity in the health care and also acquire distortion. The following can result in government failure1. Inefficiency of State provisionIn all four countries political self use up can lead to inefficiency and worsen the market failure already wassail because politicians can design policies to retain power rather than maximise efficiency. In France and Finland the taxation is ordinarily higher and results in more ex penditure and in the UK the citizens do not know how much is been used for health care and other sectors of the economy.2. Changes in government policiesIn the USA insurance firms can find it difficult to plan without knowledge of taxes, subsidies e.t.c and this will lead to inefficiency.3.Free markets usually leads to more efficient provision of health care(USA as an example) which allows the law of demand and supply to determine how the market works4. Lack of incentivesUndesirable incentives usually create inefficiencies, for example in France where doctors are paid by fee in some hospitals this will lead to inefficiency.5. Lack of informationGovernment can lack information just as much as the market because most times the government do not know what kind of health care the consumer really needs and provides this based on the information they have and may not even know the full costs/benefits of the policy.6. BureaucracyMost times procedures of the government are usually cumber some and this cuts across all the four countries. Governments respond more behind to changes and also the time it takes from planning to implementation may cause policies to be ineffective.ConclusionMarket failure is known to exist in all market economy and the health market is not an exception. It has been shown that there reasons why health care market may not work efficiently, thereby necessitating government intervention. Health care is a public good and united with the externalities and information gaps are causes of market failure which requires correction but a sufficient justification for government intervention.Intervention is known to be costly, so therefore for it to be effective a cost-benefit analysis to suggest it is worthy needs to undertaken to avoid government failure which lead to market failure in itself.