Friday, February 8, 2019
HEA ACT :: essays research papers
In our society, there are many obstacles that face students who are nerve-wracking to obtain a college education. First, the student has to do well in senior high school school, pass the S.A.T.s, and be able to afford to pay for a college education. For those who discharget afford to pay for college there is Financial Aid. But what if m nonpareiltary aid was taken away from students based solely on one minor drug offense? I will address some(prenominal) reasons why I believe the Souder Amendment is unethical and why it should be repealed. The Souder Amendment was genuine by Rep. Mark Souder that denies monetary aid to students with a drug conviction. This amendment is in total contradiction of the Higher Education Act which was developed in 1968 to provide financial aid to over 7 million students all(prenominal) year. Financial Aid was invented to provide financial assistance to students who come from first income families. Seeing how financial aid is solely based on the fam ilies financial household income, the money that is awarded to the family should not be in jeopardy if creation taken away due to the students prior drug offense. By employ this offense as a emergence to committing a drug related crime, it introduces many obstacles for middle class slew, 2minorities, and it ignores the most widely mistreat drug on college campuses - alcohol. Working class students are the majority of people that attend college on scholarships and financial aid. While in school, experimentation whitethorn introduce itself as something that should be done while attending college. The consequences of allowing yourself to overstep victim to drinking or taking drugs previously only had the consequence of a tremendous hang over the next morning. If caught by an formalised abusing drugs or alcohol, detainment would normally occur and some(prenominal) minor measures would be met to control the diversion of attempting to experiment again. But now that the Souder Ame ndment has been drafted, that one offense prevents a student from obtaining anymore government financed money to attend school. This is unethical to me because aft(prenominal) the student realizes their mistakes and suffers the embarrassment of getting caught, they now have the burden of move to obtain money to continue to pay for school. Quickly raising several thousands of dollars to pay for their next semester rarely happens and they are forced to take a semester off of school to save up so they can accede the following semester.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment